Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRIZ specialist

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 05:23, May 13, 2005 (UTC)

TRIZ specialist
It looks like a little ball of self-promotion exploded all over the page. This cannot be made into an encyclopedia article. RSpeer 03:48, May 4, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete! Spamtastic. There is a place in Wikipedia for pages like this. Unfortunately for them, it's... Wiiiiiikiiiiii Helllllll!!! -- BD 24 12 thi m k 04:50, 2005 May 4 (UTC)
 * IMHO (without emotions) it's not self-promotion , because there is no e-mails or related personal information. Later this list will be changed to table. How & where do You suggest collect all specialists? Wiki encyclopedia has articles such as List of Content Management Systems etc. It's bigger promotion, isn't it? --AndriuZ 19:08, 2005 May 4 (UTC)
 * Delete. Spam. --Carnildo 19:38, 4 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This reads like advertising for people trained in TRIZ (a somewhat suspect article itself, but I'm giving it the benefit of the doubt for now).  This is not an encyclopedia article.  Changing it to a table won't help.  Rossami (talk) 00:43, 5 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Nodelete. please see advertising. Agree, that promotional mix includes publicity, but my intention is to collect names as index table Who does What not For how Much or How Exelent. Again let's see & compare List of Content Management Systems vs Comparison of content management systems ?! IMHO logical & correct analogy.
 * Delete. Don't see anything similar List of Content Management Systems as this is a list of names, without any given reason why those are collected here. Same as I would create an article List of citizens of some very small village. If names are needed to show who contibuted what into the methotology, different name of an article is needed. Knutux 11:18, 2005 May 5 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.