Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TS Nepean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

TS Nepean

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

One of the 94 local branches of this admittedly notable organization, no reason given to think that this one might itself be notable, & I can find nothing but trivial mention in Google under several variants, eg.  Prod was placed, giving the totally irrelevant  reason "There is an ANC policy prohibiting websites outside the www.cadetnet.gov.au "   and was removed by an anon. I'd consider it for speed as non-notable group, but given the prod, I thought it should come here first. DGG (talk) 18:43, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 19:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  KuyaBriBri Talk 19:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - WP:ORG clearly isn't met. There's a long standing convention that individual Scout and cadet units are generally not notable in isolation, and there seems to be no reason why this cadet unit is any different. Nick-D (talk) 10:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - no indication that this unit is particularly distinguished to confer stand-alone notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:14, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of reliable, published sources indicating the notability of the cadet unit. -- saberwyn 08:06, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.