Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TTNY


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 10:27, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

TTNY
Maybe a neologism, maybe a hoax, heck it might even be real, but it does not seem to belong. Indrian 07:08, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom. Bobby1011 07:28, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete protologism, fails google test. Weregerbil 07:42, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:WINAD Schizombie 08:25, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The operative word is "could stand for". It could stand for a lot of things, and no, I'm not suggesting expanding it to a dab page full of redlinks! Delete. Tonywalton | Talk 13:53, 21 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Deco 23:35, 26 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.