Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TUS Project


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete. Tyrenius 18:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

TUS Project
The subject doesn't seem to be notable. The phrases "TUS Project", "Megaman Battle Network 7", and "Rockman EXE 7" all return less than 150 Google hits. Also, at least two other users have told me that this article includes inappropriate information. --Ixfd64 19:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Also, the vast majority of the information was obtained illegally, and as a result, TUS is threatening to stop the project. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.100.88.213 (talk • contribs)
 * Speedy DeleteIt's not false information, it's information that shouldn't be there. This article was laready up for AfD, but the entry has been deleted, the history of edits on the article's page was wiped. -Sukecchi 19:25, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I'm not too sure about Wikipedia's policies when it comes to leaked confidential information. I'll see what the other administrators have to say about this. --Ixfd64 19:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - I've made a post on the administrators' noticeboard regarding this issue. --Ixfd64 19:37, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment-Thank you~ -Sukecchi 19:41, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Follow Up-See, that's what we would edit it to, but would revert it back. -Sukecchi 19:56, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - This information is violating the integrity of our project. We threatened to close it because if this information continues to be disclosed it could seriously bring down the project.EXE 7 Project Threatens to Cancel Development (UnderSquare Administrator)-ZeRoRaVeN 20:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment - I removed the information that seemed unverified to me and semi-protected the article to prevent reposting by the anons. For now, I'll leave it to others to further cleanup the article and/or expand it with verifiable content.  I'm not convinced though that this topic actually deserves encyclopedia coverage.  Dragons flight 21:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete unless notability is asserted and verified. At the moment I can't see what elevates this above any other bedroom coding project. --Sam Blanning(talk) 22:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete there seem to be a number of duplicate articles floating around. Danny Lilithborne 23:20, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment TUS project. was the original name of the article until it was moved mid AFD. Ryūlóng 06:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Merging duplicated AfD into this one: --WinHunter (talk) 06:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Not notable, wrong title, apparently about a piece of vaporware The Uninvited Co., Inc. 00:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, utterly fails WP:SOFTWARE. – Someguy0830 (Talk | contribs) 00:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, not verifiable, no reliable sources indicating notability. Wmahan. 00:53, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, smells like spam, to me. Ryūlóng 03:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * And it might be an attack page too, which is why I have listed it as such. Ryūlóng 04:23, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as spam. MER-C 13:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SPAM Hello32020 13:51, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.   14:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As a member of this project, I had no say in the creation of this artile other than telling them not to make it for this reason, it will get deleted. Now we need it gone as it, like Ryu has shown, is an attack target. -Sukecchi 17:16, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Vaporware"? Something's vaporware when it starts missing deadlines.  Call EXE7 non-notable all you want, but don't insult it.  ~ CZeke 17:45, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * CommentThe IP Address 162.84.180.223 reverts the page to before the AfD was placed on it, something needs done about this. -Sukecchi 18:19, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Also delete Megaman exe 7 which is a duplicate page. Danny Lilithborne 23:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Valarauka 16:13, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions.   -- Xiange 11:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.