Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV-B-Gone


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 02:50, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

TV-B-Gone

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Advertisement with no assertion of notability or citations to reliable sources Dlabtot (talk) 04:30, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep It does read like an ad for sure, but it's a product which recieved plenty of press for it's use and grief from the CES over Gizmodo acting like twelve-year olds and playing with it at last year's convention. I think sources for at least the prank and in turn the product's use can be found.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 06:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark for cleanup. There are plenty of reliable sources  and I wonder if the nominator made the effort to look for them before deciding this product is non-notable. JulesH (talk) 08:36, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * I wonder if you are serious about your assertion that gaj-it.com and gizmodo.com are reliable sources. If the article is retained, the ad copy should be deleted from it at a bare minimum. Dlabtot (talk) 17:05, 27 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep there are plenty of sources for this one. JBsupreme (talk) 09:07, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per JulesH - Mgm|(talk) 10:15, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep: Sources provided by JulesH clearly show that the notability is more than enough for us to have an article on it. It's in serious need of a copyedit though :)  C h a m a l  talk 13:45, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep well sourced, but right now fails WP:ADVERT. Radiopathy (talk) 19:01, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.