Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV Noise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Phantom Steve / talk &#124; contribs \ 00:50, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

TV Noise

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

They seem to be on a legitimate label, but no indication of their notability. The fact that the article says they are "upcoming" only serves to evidence that they are not currently notable. I'd be happy to change my vote, however, if sources are provided. Joel Why? (talk) 18:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 19:50, 26 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete as unreferenced promotional piece. Fails WP:NBAND. DreamGuy (talk) 02:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - It is like a promo as "upcoming". This doesn't look notable now. They can be in future but for now, it doesn't have enough WP:RS nor enough notable content.  →TSU tp* 20:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete at its presence, the subject fails WP:BAND because of its lack of coverage in reliable third-party sources to demonstrate notability. → B  music  ian  05:46, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete When "upcoming" is used in the lede, we're not off to a good start. No evidence of WP:BAND notability. OhNo itsJamie Talk 23:00, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.