Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV Satyanarayana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:01, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

TV Satyanarayana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a promotional article about a non-notable or barelyntoable academic. WP:PROF is a worldwide standard, andhe does not meet it as an expert. The article is promotional by its emphasis on minor awards and the like --what does being a Life Member of a RedCross Society have to do with notability as an engineer? As is usually the case, this sort of emphasis is found where there simply isn't anything major enough for a convincing article. I declined a speedy on this, because it does at least claim significance. But it certainly doesn't prove it.  DGG ( talk ) 02:50, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Here, for brevities sake, let me help. Fails WP:PROMO & WP:SELFPUB.  Does not establish notability reliably  Nikto   wha?  03:46, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as I concur this is still advertorial and so questionable, there's still nothing actually convincing regarding notability, nothing suggesting minimally better. SwisterTwister   talk  04:44, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.