Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TV Tonight Awards 2022


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  00:45, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

TV Tonight Awards 2022

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Like the 2020 and 2021 awards, the 2022 awards list is not notable, having no significant coverage outside of the TV Tonight website itself, failing WP:NTV and WP:GNG. At best, redirect to TV Tonight. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 01:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC) Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge/Redirect to, I assume, TV Tonight. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:08, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television, Websites, Lists,  and Australia. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 01:13, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent reliable sources have been provided to establish that these awards are notable outside the website that organizes them. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:39, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Awards-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect per WP:ATD-R. Happily888 (talk) 21:51, 10 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete: I don't believe that the award itself is notable to warrant its own article, so individual years shouldn't have articles either. I do not believe that merging is appropriate because then the bulk of the TV Tonight article would be two years' worth of awards tables (and more if others decided to continue adding on), which is undue. voorts (talk/contributions) 01:59, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete for the same reasons discussed above. I don't see benefit of a merge for the same WP:UNDUE reasons already highlighted. Similarly, I don't feel a redirect would serve as a useful navigation aid for a reader, given the main article isn't offering information on specific years and the title is closely related to the main article's name anyway. Bungle (talk • contribs) 10:25, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per above JM (talk) 16:43, 17 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete per Bungle. Agletarang (talk) 04:49, 20 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.