Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TWEN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge and redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 12:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)

TWEN
Was tagged for speedy deletion as an advertisement, but it doesn't really read like an ad. Bringing it to AfD to respect the desire of the anon user who tagged it. No vote.  howch e  ng   {chat} 07:37, 28 December 2005 (UTC) 'This AfD is being relisted to generate a clearer consensus. Please add new discussion below this notice. Thanks!' Mo0 [ talk ] 05:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge & redirect to Westlaw.Obina 10:32, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge to Westlaw per Obina. -- JLaTondre 01:28, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge Cleanup and Wikify before transferring information to Westlaw. -- (aeropagitica)  07:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge as per above. Not really worth a repost. Proto t c 12:57, 5 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.