Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table of lunar month correspondences


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete as not appropriate for a stand-alone article. --Philosopher Let us reason together. 22:49, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Table of lunar month correspondences

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Woefully incomplete and totally out of date. While those two reasons by themselves are not sufficient for deletion, they are when combined with the fact that this article at best would be the start to an almanac-type Wikibook on lunar calendar correspondences, assuming anyone was interested in writing one, which judging by the lack of effort on this article, no one is. Carolina wren (talk) 06:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all articles that claim to be tables of data. JORGENEV  10:12, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as this information alone certainly doesn't seem to deserve its own article. Perhaps if a citation can be found, though, it might be useful in an existing article?  —Entropy (T/C) 11:23, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:08, 20 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I'm inclined to consider that, with a source, this would be a useful inclusion in the rather short lunar month article. The problem is of course that the author didn't use one source; he used one per calendar and stitched them together. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 13:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.