Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nja 247 09:16, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Table of prophets of Abrahamic religions

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Almost entirely unsourced speculation and original research. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:52, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 02:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I think almost  everything here can be very easily sourced--and most of it is. Some of it I have some doubts about. Some I would like more authoritative sources. Needs a little work. DGG (talk) 04:17, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Abrahamic prophets, since there is a lot of convergence here, is a useful category and the article, with more sourcings, is a good example of what Wikipedia can do.--Moloch09 (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see how this can be considered an unsuitable topic for an encyclopedia, as this has for the last one or two millennia been one of the main subjects of research in the parts of the world influenced by these religions, so I'm sure more sources can be found. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:11, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The article would benefit from editing, but I believe it provides an important contribution to Wikipedia's coverage of religion. Pastor Theo (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sure, it needs some work (especially the inclusion of material from the Q'ran, to match the title of the article.), but that is not a cause for deletion. I don't see the OR here.  Athanasius • Quicumque vult  16:22, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.