Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Table of years in LGBT rights


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Convert to navigation template, then delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Please make a speedy deletion request with reference to this AfD after the conversion is complete.  Sandstein  09:24, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Table of years in LGBT rights

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Nothing here that isn't already in List of years in LGBT rights, and nothing to merge. Mathglot (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC) This is perhaps emblematic of a larger problem: I typed " " in the search bar and clicked on the first suggested topic, which was Table of years in literature. Sure enough, that seems to be a proper subset of List of years in literature, although the former is organized more compactly. Seems to me in that case, switching the latter to contain a Compact ToC looking much like the former (or perhaps greater compactness, starting with century, then maybe decades as it got closer to present time, then years) would be a better solution. I don't see the point of having both articles. A systematic review of matching titles of the form Table of years in and List of years in might turn up more of these. Mathglot (talk) 22:07, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Discrimination, History, Law,  and Sexuality and gender. Mathglot (talk) 21:52, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Convert to template, then delete this -- This is essentially a navigational tool, leading to articles such as 20xx in LGBT rights. The usual way to handle this issue is via a template that facilitates such navigation, placed in each of the destination articles.  My personal inclination would be plain deletion, but that reflects my own POV on the subject, which is why I rarely comment on LGBT articles.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Convert to template as per above. Did not see any reason to keep the article. Tutwakhamoe (talk) 03:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.