Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tachyboloid


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete under both names. Jayjg (talk) 01:37, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Tachyboloid

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

OR article on a neologism. TimothyRias (talk) 08:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Move to rapidity space (descriptive phrase per policy)Rgdboer (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Article appears to have supporting references in academic publications - they're just not cited in proper Wikipedia style. In the absence of an expert in the subject matter who's able to check the sources, I'd err on the side of assuming good faith and keep the article (possibly with a "potential original research" tag at the top). - DustFormsWords (talk) 09:01, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete The comments from the author on the article's talk page point to it being original research/synthesis. Cassandra 73 (talk) 12:32, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V unless an expert in the domain thinks that the article has salvageable content that could be used under another title. The "supporting references" do not use the word tachyboloid at all, as far as I saw (but I only took the most cursory glance), and there are zero Google hits outside Wikipedia. The author of the article seems to have gone on a bit of a spree adding tachyboloid references to other articles (e.g.,, , ), so assuming this term is as fictitious as it appears to be, someone will need to go through Rgdboer's edit history and revert these additions. —Caesura(t) 16:44, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Move Descriptive phrase title for same subject rapidity space Rgdboer (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 03:21, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Rgdboer has changed the article ("Tachyboloid") to a redirect before waiting for this AfD to close. Now I am unable to view the merits of the article and decide whether it should be kept. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  13:17, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Rgdboer (the author) has moved the article to Rapidity space, and amended the terminology in the article. Cassandra 73 (talk) 13:32, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks. Delete. This term is a neologism that does not (yet) has widespread use. It is not notable of itself. Axl  ¤  [Talk]  17:49, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete both Tachyboloid and the fork at rapidity space. Talk page shows they are both neologisms and content is OR. Gandalf61 (talk) 23:38, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete both, which appear to be OR or original synthesis. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:26, 23 November 2009 (UTC).
 * Delete both WP:Neologisms. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 01:27, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.