Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical Edge, Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw talk 02:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Tactical Edge, Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I PRODed this but it was questioned by one of the apparent company employees, who naturally is unaware of policy but, regardless, this is not suitable for Wikipedia as it's still advertising and clearly only exists as a business listing hence WP:NOT applies. There's absolutely nothing here to suggest any actual independent or notability or that we should overwork ourselves with such as an easy case. SwisterTwister  talk  00:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note I'm not sure what policy they were breaking by requesting an undelete, as all PRODs are allowed to be undeleted upon request. Primefac (talk) 02:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 14:24, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Fails WP:CORP -- HighKing ++ 15:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, st170e talk 01:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable small company that fails WP:CORP and is more than likely a promo. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.