Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical Sekt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  16:32, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Tactical Sekt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not satisfy WP:BAND. Third-party independent sources to establish notability are very scarce; I could only find this OC Weekly article, which is partly an interview. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 17:51, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Note: Per the suggestion of, I am also nominating the following related pages for the band's albums since they do not satisfy WP:NALBUM:

- Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:40, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete a promotional piece of a non-notable band with no significant coverage in reliable sources - Fails WP:BAND. GSS &#x202F;&#128172; 18:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - The name was familiar so I decided to look them up. I have also found the OC Weekly article, as well an album review on Metal.de and Sputnikmusic. These are reliable sources. The rest of the results are the usual junk like databases, social media, streaming sites, blogs, retail sites and concert sites (the concert sites only state that "they have no upcoming concerts for this artist" - that's right because they split up).GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing those out. Metal.de is indeed a reliable source, but Sputnikmusic entry has no staff or emeritus reviews that can be used as far as I see. (per WP:A/S) Myxomatosis57 (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination: falls short of criteria at WP:NBAND. Can we bundle their three albums, Geneticide, Burn Process and Syncope (album) into this nomination? I can't find anything that would pass WP:NALBUM for any of them. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 19:29, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, it would indeed be appropriate to bundle them since they certainly do fail the notability criteria for WP:NALBUM. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 20:34, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment - I see the albums aren't notable on their own, and would fit better on the band page. Regarding the band, is it expected that a band gradually loses notability, and has its page deleted? It's difficult to find evidence 10 years later, when much of it was probably in print-only magazines.  It looks like there was a tour in 2007, following an album charting in the Deutsche Alternative Charts, although de:wiki doesn't like that chart.  A German fan might have better sources, i.e. old magazines.
 * It looks like I don't like WP:BAND, but I don't want to get involved, so I'm not going to vote for retaining the articles. ƕ (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.