Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tactical Synthetic Aperture Radar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete: G12, unambiguous copyright infringement. Timothy Joseph Wood 18:13, 9 January 2017 (UTC)

Tactical Synthetic Aperture Radar

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article is extremely vague when it comes to explaining the TSAR concept. Most of the content in this article describes and is relevant to synthetic aperture radars in general. The TSAR-specific parts could be condensed down to "The Tactical Synthetic Aperture Radar (TSAR) is a synthetic aperture radar system introduced on the MQ-8B Fire Scout unmanned aerial vehicle. It delivers high-resolution, wide-area radar images. The images generated by the TSAR are 3D rather than 2D unlike typical SAR images."

Also, the included source does not seem to mention this specific technology anywhere anymore. Thus, unless additional details and sources are added I would recommend deleting this article. Quibik (talk) 21:12, 2 January 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:55, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as a copyvio. I've tagged the article with db-g12 seeing as there isn't much left after the infringing material is deleted. Laurdecl talk 07:21, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist  (Speak quickly) (Follow my trail) 09:35, 9 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.