Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tad Hill


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 03:16, 13 May 2015 (UTC)

Tad Hill

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am not finding any evidence in reliable, independent sources that this individual meets notability requirements. Of the claim that "Hill has been featured as one of today’s leading financial professionals in USA Today, the Wall Street Journal, and Newsweek magazine, and on CNBC, Fox, and ABC" I could verify only that he was interviewed briefly on CNBC. RichardOSmith (talk) 20:08, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Borderline notability at best; borderline promotionalism. The combination isa reason for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 01:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - press releases do not qualify as reliable sources.--Rpclod (talk) 01:34, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Agreed, multiple searches found no significant or notable links (mostly press releases), the only thing from a good website was an event listing. SwisterTwister   talk  04:38, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.