Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tadlock's Glasses


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) Erik9 (talk) 01:40, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Tadlock's Glasses
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unreleased album, I don't think this warrants inclusion as per WP:CRYSTAL Jenuk1985  |  Talk  07:58, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep I did some searching, it's there in Spin Magazine and there are mentions on the BB forum, however they have not been made by the band, so they don't necessarily count. It's the working title of an album that the band says they are working on. Without speculation, one can suppose, with a fair amount of confidence, that the Bestie Boys will release another album, probably under this title, so it's not that far fetched - so I don't believe WP:CRYSTAL applies here. --Ouro (blah blah) 10:30, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per above, and the article passes WP:CRYSTAL. Yellowweasel (talk) 11:26, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Article source is cited and a member of the band says that collectively they are calling the album this. Going into the final stages of the album's production, I find it difficult to believe the band would mention the name of the album, which references a friend, if that wasn't going to remain the title. No other titles are even alluded to being in contention. I don't believe WP:CRYSTAL applies here. Galapogosian (talk) 10:32 a.m., 25 February 2009 (EST)
 * Keep - I originally PRODed this because it contained very little information and didn't even squeak by WP:CRYSTAL, but it has definitely been expanded enough that I think should be kept. § FreeRangeFrog 21:13, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:CRYSTAL. Aw, Jenuk you're just jealeaus, it's the BEAS-TIE-BOYS! --Sloane (talk) 21:36, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. The Beastie Boys!  Certainly notable and verifiable. EagleFan (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. The album is going to be released later this year and the information in the article is verifiable, so no need to delete it to have it recreated in a few months. And the Beastie Boys are notable enough, no question about that. Laurent (talk) 13:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow keep and tag for further sourcing.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:25, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Passes WP:CRYSTAL, verifiable. Radiopathy (talk) 16:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep Ikip (talk) 01:34, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.