Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:38, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Tae Kwon Do Life Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources. Too young to be notable yet. Does not meet WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 13:09, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Publications-related deletion discussions. /wiae  /tlk  14:21, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Niche publication that has not even appeared yet - this reads like a press release. Not sure this would ever have a broader impact -definitely WP:TOOSOON.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:06, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete No significant or independent coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Mdtemp (talk) 14:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree with the previous comments. There is no significant independent coverage to show this magazine is notable. Papaursa (talk) 00:46, 18 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.