Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tae kwon do 3d


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Cbrown1023   talk   16:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Tae kwon do 3d

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Educational software. This article is written like a magazine review and would need a substantial rewrite to become an encyclopedia article. No notability asserted. Delete. Blanchardb- Me • MyEars • MyMouth -timed 01:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment. As far as I can tell, the article should be called "Taekwondo 3D."  Hopefully that'll help anyone who has the time to look into this.   Anturiaethwr  Talk  02:17, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy close Article was PRODed when it was one minute old, and AfDed at fourteen minutes. G-hits throw a lot of false positives, but the article should have time to develop. The creator's been editing it pretty steadily since it was created. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's SPAM and/or a review for NN software Doc StrangeMailbox Logbook 03:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete time elapsed since creation is not a reason for keep when there's no eviden e this is notable software Cari MeSpeak! 21:45, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete on the basis of notability, not the quality of the current revision of the article. BigBlueFish (talk) 14:44, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 23:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.