Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taekido


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete.  Sango  123   15:18, 17 June 2006 (UTC)

Taekido
I propose that this article be deleted because it discusses a non-notable martial art with no substantiating information beyond that put into the article. It's a vanity piece and deserves to be treated accordingly. --Scb steve 02:58, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Looks like a copy-paste job from another site. --Srikeit (Talk 04:13, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's copied from here. Fan1967 04:29, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It looks like a nn mashup of taekwondo and aikido, likely taught by only one person worldwide (two, if he's got an assistant). Zetawoof(&zeta;) 05:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Copyvio process. Clear copyvio of . Paddles TC 09:23, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Abstain The version at the time of the AfD is a clear copyvio of the page Fan1967 mentioned, however I've found an earlier edit (over a year old) that doesn't suffer the same problems. AfD left intact and links/categories updated. Paddles TC 09:36, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Question Is this going to be deleted now? --Scb steve 14:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Good question. The people (including you) who have made recommendations so far can alter their recommendation if they think the page is now worth keeping, or can leave their "vote" unchanged. As things stand, the consensus is still to delete. The reversion I did only addresses the immediate copyvio problems, it doesn't do anything to resolve the question about notability. I continue to abstain. Paddles TC 14:55, 16 June 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.