Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tagbilaran Accelerated Christian School (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. L Faraone  02:29, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Tagbilaran Accelerated Christian School
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The school is currently non-existent, page is poorly written (no attempts were made to improve article) and has no references whatsoever Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 08:53, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:06, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but improve. The article states that it is existent, and it has a high school department, which has generally been considered a claim to notability on Wikipedia. However, the article at the moment has no sources, so it's probably best to try and find some. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment The article is outdated.  It doesn't exist anymore, they closed up business after moving multiple times.  There are no sources, because it isn't notable locally.  This is because there were less than 30 students in the high school.  Also, it isn't very logical to create an article for every high school (public or private) in the Philippines. Especially if the school doesn't even exist anymore.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 15:18, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Even if this is the case, notability is not temporary, and thus, once a subject is notable, it is always notable, even if it closes. However, there has been long-standing consensus on Wikipedia that secondary schools are inherently notable. if you disagree with the consensus, you are free to start a discussion on it. The problem with the article is that, very few schools below the college level in the Philippines have an internet presence, so sources are pretty much next to impossible to find. This, however, does not mean the subject is not notable. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 01:26, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete The article is sure not to be improved, ever.  It's significance is irrelevant, because the school only existed for a few years afterwhich it closed.  The information on the article is severely outdated and probably won't be updated.  The last time anyone added anything significant to the page was in 2009, when the page was created.  The article was soon cut shorter because it contained a lot of non-encyclopedic BS.  Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 09:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, there are no non-primary reliable sources that verify that the organisation exists. Therefore, failing WP:VER it does not come anywhere close to being notable as defined by WP:GNG and thus I am supporting deletion.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete When we have sources, there will probably be  thousands of articles to write, but we cannot do it until then. This is the case not just with the Philippines, but many other countries. It's great reduced our ability to cover topics like this is Africa and some parts of the middle east also.    At the previous afd, a ref was mentioned, but the site seems no longer available.&#39;DGG (at NYPL) (talk) 18:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.