Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tahir Jarwali


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:57, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Tahir Jarwali

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Could not find significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  01:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete unless anything of value is left once all the peacock crap is washed off.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:44, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:05, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   10:23, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. I can't see a source of notability. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC).
 * Delete. No significant and notable person. ramansoz ( talk) raman 03:58, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete in the absence of third-party reliable sources that would show a pass of WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:07, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.