Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taichung Municipal Taichung Girls' Senior High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 00:23, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Taichung Municipal Taichung Girls' Senior High School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. Google search gives only brief mentions from reliable sites and the official site of the school, which are not enough to show notability. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. 4thfile4thrank (talk) 17:29, 31 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:NSCHOOL and even if this is deleted there will still be an article on the Chinese Wikipedia. – Cupper 52 Discuss! 18:07, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * In its current form, the article obviously fails WP:NSCHOOL. That said, there seems to be plenty of coverage from secondary sources, but the information just hasn't been transferred to Wikipedia. I'm not necessarily in favor or against deleting the article. I'm just making an observation. LeBron4 (talk) 19:39, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - the state of the article isn't relative to this discussion. As the above editor has found sources, we must keep it. WP:BEFORE is policy. Notability hinges on the available sources for the subject, not the references on the article. As with the vast majority of school articles nominated for deletion in the past six months, this nomination ignores that. It also ignores that according to Wikipedia's mission statement, we are supposed to be a gazetteer. Schools are important structures included in most gazetteers. 174.254.193.114 (talk) 23:51, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Due to the lack of available sourcing that it would need to pass WP:GNG or WP:NORG. Since all that comes up about it from what I can tell is a puff piece by Epoch Times. Which is both trivial as an article and likely from a non-reputable source anyway. The ones in the Chinese article don't cut it either. Otherwise, where are the in-depth reliable sources that are claimed exist about this? Because I'm more then willing to change my vote to keep if anyone can come up with them. In the meantime, I don't think articles about run of the mill things like the principle not running for reelection and dead links cut it for notability though. --Adamant1 (talk) 02:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete: The two sources in the article are not IS or SIGCOV, they are from the government and the school websites. Article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOOL / (WP:ORGCRIT). Subject lacks WP:IS WP:RS WP:SIGCOV that address the subject directly and in-depth.  // Timothy ::  talk  01:06, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Keep per the significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources.  The article notes (translated from Google Translate)  "For the 100th Anniversary of Taichung Girls’ High School, more than three hundred 'sisters' reorganized the music team and performed at their alma mater, and the alumnae choir sang folk songs and gave their blessings. Even the alumna who graduated in 1975, the singer Chyi Yu also returned to her alma mater."   The article notes (translated from Google Translate): "Taichung Girls' High School held its 100th anniversary celebration on the 14th, and the "Leyi Alumnae Celebrating Centennial" event attracted the most attention."    </li> <li> The article notes (translated from Google Translate): "Taichung Girls' High School is the only girls' school in Taiwan where students can wear shorts in and out of the school." </li> <li></li> <li></li> </ol>There is sufficient coverage in reliable sources to allow Taichung Girls' Senior High School to pass Notability, which requires "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject". Cunard (talk) 01:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC) </li></ul>
 * Comment: Sources such as "Taichung Girls' High School is the only girls' school in Taiwan where students can wear shorts in and out of the school" does not demonstrate notability. <span style="font-family:Courier New, Courier, monospace;"> // Timothy ::  talk  20:17, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
 * 'Unusual dress code' (so unusual as to be the only case in an entire country) commented on by independent-reliable-sources-etc seems notable to me. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:38, 12 January 2021 (UTC) <div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"> Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: No comments in 7 days and unclear consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steve M (talk) 23:43, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * <small class="delsort-notice">Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 00:12, 20 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep per Cunard. As I've said in the past, BEFORE should be treated with the utmost caution when you don't speak the language most relevant to the article's subject. Vaticidalprophet (talk) 02:52, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep - the sources shown by Cunard are enough to show a passing of GNG. The article, when it was first put up for deletion, was not in a state that showed notability but it's worth noting that some of those reliable, independent sources have now been incorporated Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:18, 20 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm glad Cunard was able to find some sources. What exactly have we gotten out of those sources content wise that isn't extremely trivial, like that they a well-known marching band (however that's determined and verified) though? --Adamant1 (talk) 22:42, 24 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.