Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taieb Znati (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:39, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Taieb Znati
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject of article fails to meet Wikipedia's General Notability Guidelines and Guidelines for Professional/Academic listing. Subject is not notable and a search reveals that subject has not published hardly anything recently. Requesting registered user to please create this article's AFD page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.255.102.180 (talk) 20:03, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * And so I did. Neutral. Ansh666 22:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Several hugely-cited articles/books on GScholar. Meet WP:ACADEMIC#1. See also the previous AfD. That the subject has not published much recently (I didn't check that but take the word of the nom for this) is not relevant, notability is not temporary. --Randykitty (talk) 13:44, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:18, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep for the same reason as last time — highly cited publications giving a pass of WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:03, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. Just passes WP:Prof in this highly cited subject. Xxanthippe (talk) 09:58, 21 December 2013 (UTC).
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.