Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Per WP:NPASR (non-admin closure) — UY Scuti Talk  20:52, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Taipei Economic and Cultural Representative Office in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:ORG. diplomatic missions are not inherently notable. All the sources prove is that the office exists rather than in depth third party coverage. LibStar (talk) 13:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 12 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- RoySmith (talk) 00:20, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Plenty of coverage to be found and this seems to be the official ambassador of Taiwan since Taiwan famously has to operate a bit differently in international matters. Mr. Magoo (talk) 01:29, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Additionally, it doesn't seem to operate in just Saudi Arabia as mentioned in the article but on a larger scale. Mr. Magoo (talk) 01:31, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * The sources merely confirm existence, can you give examples of in depth coverage. LibStar (talk) 07:56, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * There's a lengthy interview with an "ambassador," a story on a meeting between a prince and the ambassador and three stories on events run by the office which also cover the office. If you were to cover a person, what kind of coverage would constitute as "in-depth coverage?" Because I don't know what's more in-depth than an interview. Regardless of those there are countless of official pages "confirming the existence" which could be used as sources all the same even without these news articles. Mr. Magoo (talk) 10:13, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 06:06, 20 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.