Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiwan Fuel Cell Partnership


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 18:26, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Taiwan Fuel Cell Partnership

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Short stub with unclear notability. Ephemeral project. No independent sources about this project. Beagel (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 00:42, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep however it's mainly because I am finding hits for it, but unfortunately I don't speak the language of most of the site (taiwan, mandarin?). I believe it could (fairly?) meet notability, but I simply don't have the language skills to comfirm this.  One non "asian" language I found this mentioned was an article involving Canada- the link is http://www.canada.org.tw/taiwan/highlights-faits/2011/CHFCA-TFCP-MOU-2011.aspx?lang=eng.  Just by reading I would assume that this article can meet notability, but once again I simply don't have the language skills to examine the majority of the info involved that I have found on the web.  I think this may just be a case where we are an english wiki (with all the so-called "western" ideas that go with it) and simply don't have adequate coverage on in our own media institutions.  tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 06:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. Despite the fact that the Taiwan Fuel Cell Partnership signed a MoU with the Canadian Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Association, is there anything about the Taiwan Fuel Cell Partnership? If not, by my understanding this article is not enough to meet WP:GNG. Possible sources in Chinese needs verification if they are reliable and about the subject. Although interwiki is not an argument for AfD, but there is no article in Chinese (or in any other language) for this organization, so it is doubtful if it is really notable even by these standards. Beagel (talk) 07:30, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * re Oh I generally agree with you Beagel, but since I am not fluent (or even novice) in the languages I am finding I figured it best, IMHO, to just let it stand until more sources either do or do not appear. Perhaps that is a bit naive on my part but as I've said I am a bit of an inclusionist so I tend to give the benefit of the doubt more often than not.  However if we cannot provide any more sources than found and other language sources are no more than what we see here then I whole-heartedly agree with ya.  As always I am a "class" "True Neutral" so I will change accordingly.  tyvm Pudge MclameO (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * If there are reliable sources (including in other languages) for adding and improving the article, I will agree with 'keep'. I just don't see these sources right now (I am also not the Chinese speaker, so if anybody familiar with this language could help, it will be excellent). Beagel (talk) 08:08, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Notability not established as written. Ebikeguy (talk) 00:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 02:14, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 10:35, 25 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisting comment. Still insufficient discussion from which to plot consensus. Let's discuss this further. BusterD (talk) 10:38, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of wp:notability. Does not even have any notability related claims in text. North8000 (talk) 11:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.