Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tajuddeen Cheraman Perumal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Deryck C. 12:44, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Tajuddeen Cheraman Perumal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The only source provided is the official website of an organization which has been involved in perhaps two dozen violations of WP:ADVERT through various accounts. This is on top of the fact that this single sources fails to satisfy the Notability (people) guideline - why is the subject of the article notable? In fact, it's difficult to discern what in this article consists of historical claims and what merely consists of apocryphal legends. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. MezzoMezzo (talk) 05:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Duplicate merge to Cheraman Perumal In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:39, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep but tag for better referencing. Cheraman Perumal appears to be a title.  This is the name of one person who held the title.  Unless some one can establish that this is a hoax or similar, we should keep it.  Even legnedary evetns are potentially notable.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. The article is in very poor shape, but makes a pretty serious claim to notability that is substantiated on a variety of other sites.  Though not ideal, this  gives some idea of his perception in Islamic historiography.  The subject's notability, either as a legend or as a historical figure, is pretty much ascertained through a Google Books search .   dci  &#124;  TALK   02:22, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.