Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taka (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. If someone wants to try and improve and work on meeting inclusion requirements for the page I would be happy to userfy it to them or send it to the incubator. J04n(talk page) 12:57, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Taka (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

weak description, no reliable sources, links and references are not enough to be an encyclopedic article Md31sabbir (talk) 04:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 29.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  04:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Cameron11598  (Converse) 05:02, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  05:27, 29 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment: The filmmaker himself has suitable notability, that his works may be considered for inlcusion somewhere... possibly in an as-yet-uncreated Shahidul Islam Khokon article.  What we have here is yet, another Bangladesh-related AFD from this nominator using possibly improvable content issues as a deletion rationale. Perhaps he might visit WP:DEL and rethink his "justifications" to make them seem less that he might simply dislike Bangladeshi topics. And a hint to him, even if a source is non-English that does not mean they are unsuitable. Notability need not be world-wide. Notable even if only to Bangldesh through Bangladeshi sources is perfectly fine.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar   &middot;   &middot;  04:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)




 * Delete as per nomination.  Faizan   -  Let's talk!   13:52, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, L Faraone  05:02, 14 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep apparently the most popular film in a major festival.  DGG ( talk ) 21:58, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * What festival? In what way was it "popular"? 66.108.176.187 (talk) 09:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Still waiting to hear what film festival DGG is talking about. 66.108.176.187 (talk) 23:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.