Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takaki Ose (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Geschichte (talk) 09:03, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Takaki Ose
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Deleted last year for failing WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. He is still not playing at the professional level so there is no claim to the latter guideline. In terms of GNG, the one cited source is not significant coverage; it's just a contract renewal announcement. I found him mentioned in an image caption here but that also doesn't establish anything. If anyone can show clear significant, detailed coverage I will happily withdraw but, for now, I see no reason why this article shouldn't be deleted for a third time. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:50, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

        Does this constitute detailed coverage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wolfkill13 (talk • contribs) 07:46, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom. Non-notable footballer with no pro appearances. JTtheOG (talk) 09:24, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 10:56, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. --John B123 (talk) 12:20, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: still fails GNG and NFOOTBALL, recommend Salt JW 1961 Talk 15:22, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. CLearly not notable at the moment. Oppose SALTing however as his career is still active and he could be notable someday. Smartyllama (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: Per nom. No evidence of notability and doesn't have the required level of WP:SIGCOV for a standalone article. As with the other two AfD's, this should also result in delete in my opinion. Third time's a charm? GauchoDude (talk) 16:58, 28 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm still new to Wikipedia and still trying to understand how it works. I found him on Soccerway and footballdatabase . As well as a number of articles that mentions him:
 * I would say that none of these constitute detailed coverage. Soccerway and Football Database are wide-ranging databases that attempt to provide exhaustive stats about almost every footballer. Appearing in such a database does not automatically mean that that footballer needs a stand-alone article in Wikipedia. The remaining sources linked are all trivial mentions in match reports. WP:SIGCOV requires coverage that addresses the topic directly and in detail. For an example of how SIGCOV works, please see this example. That would clearly be significant, detailed coverage of Kazuyoshi Miura. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:52, 31 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.