Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takamichi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Takamichi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable on top of multiple old issues Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 09:31, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete I was unable to find any coverage by reliable sources on either Google or Google Books. Doesn't seem to be notable under WP:BIO. --  Toshio   Yamaguchi  10:03, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:22, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - No sources in the article. A cursory Google search turns up nothing.  --Noleander (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - A Japanese Google search actually comes up with quite a lot of hits, but I am having a hard time determining how many of these are RS. He seems quite popular among the otaku crowd, but it's hard to tell how much goes beyond blogs and non-independent sources. There are a bunch of articles in Natari: here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here; and another in ASCII. But I am not sure how much we can call these RS. Perhaps others can help judge or do some digging. Michitaro (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not seeing sufficient in-depth coverage or reliable sourcing to justify a self-standing biographical article like this. --DAJF (talk) 03:22, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - just too little, if any, coverage in reliable sources. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 11:55, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.