Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. If anyone wants the content for a transwiki, drop me a note. Stifle (talk) 11:21, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Takat

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Rules-only description of a game of dubious notability. Wikipedia is not a game guide, and not having won an award isn't enough to meet WP:N. The only references are an entry in an inclusive directory, and a link to an online play site that should be removed per WP:EL. Percy Snoodle (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletion discussions.   —Percy Snoodle (talk) 12:47, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: As much as I would like to (generally) keep all game articles, an online search doesn't reveal anything that would establish notability.  The only things I have found are the trivial references to "not winning an award" and further rules descriptions in other forms.  --Craw-daddy | T | 12:44, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Pastordavid (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Transwiki Thinking that this should go to wikibooks? --Pmedema (talk) 17:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
 * delete seems NN, and looks rather like a copyvio for long sections. Johnbod (talk) 13:47, 19 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.