Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takatak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Davewild (talk) 08:19, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Takatak

 * – ( View AfD View log )

claims of notability for a months'-old band not backed by sources Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 03:49, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - One single so far, listed at some sites, but no sign of meeting WP:BAND yet.--Tikiwont (talk) 13:09, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - the only possible claim to notability is the assertion that the single which is their only release so far "topped all local charts in the first week of release", but this is not confirmed by the sources cited. We would need to see evidence that this was true and that the local charts were significant enough to meet WP:BAND, which requires "any country's national music chart". JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.