Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take 2 for Faith


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to Draftspace. Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 19:25, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Take 2 for Faith

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film that fails WP:NFILM. GeoffreyT2000 ( talk,  contribs ) 21:32, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to draft it's not possible to tell what kind of notoriety or coverage it'll get till it's released. If it becomes a hit, it might be notable, but we can't tell about that now. By moving it to draftspace, we can keep the content and hopefully add sources, or delete the draft if the film is a flop. White Arabian Filly  Neigh 21:50, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Userfy/Draftify until such time that the film is able to meet the GNG. Exemplo347 (talk) 22:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to draft/userpace as per above. Lepricavark (talk) 15:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:47, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - If sources pop up someone can go to WP:REFUND & have it undeleted, At present the film isn't notable so the best solution is to delete for now (Once moved to draft - If the film becomes a flop it wold mean the draft would have to go to MFD so it would've meant all this moving & flaffing around for nothing whereas deletion is one simple click and undeletion is again one simple click). – Davey 2010 Talk 00:11, 6 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.