Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Action! Vol. 8


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:48, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Take Action! Vol. 8

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable compilation album; article is nothing but a track listing. I42 (talk) 18:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Also nominated, for the same reason:

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - When the artist is notable, we generally have a short stub with the track-listing and a release date. Most of the artists are wikilinked, so they are notable I presume. Also, google returns some decent hits, such as this and this. Finally, the issue of the article only having a track-listing is no big deal. See La Pipa de la Paz, S.E.X.Y., and M.O.B.: The Album for articles on albums that only feature a brief intro piece and then a track-listing. Lәo(βǃʘʘɱ) 18:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:05, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:NALBUMS tells us no more than that we should apply the WP:GNG (its advice that "if the musician or ensemble that recorded an album is considered notable, then officially released albums may have sufficient notability" and that "[a]lbum articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article" obviously doesn't apply to compilation albums). And neither article fares well by that measure, which "requires significant coverage [of the subject, viz. these two albums] in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." The article makes no assertion of notability, offers no links supporting notability, and I see only a handful of ghits, many of which appear to be online stores selling it. - Simon Dodd { U·T·C·WP:LAW } 02:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.