Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take It & Break It


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 03:29, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Take It & Break It
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable series of remix albums. Fails WP:MUSIC. TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:25, 2 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —TheJazzDalek (talk) 20:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - The reviews provided in the external links section should demonstrate notability. If the article is not considered sufficiently developped, it should be merged/redirected to the corresponding section on the Celldweller article here. Neelix (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Reviews of 2 volumes on CDBaby (a store), 1 review of 1 volume in ReGen, an online music magazine, and 1 review of 1 volume in the ReGen blog (not in their regular reviews section). And, really, the CDBaby reviews should be removed from the article. Certainly any sourced content that is noteworthy in the career of Celldweller should be merged to the parent article. As the article in question amounts to little more than a track list, that shouldn't prove difficult. TheJazzDalek (talk) 21:50, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: insufficient independent 3rd party coverage, non-notable. JamesBurns (talk) 05:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak delete – there's some coverage in the magazine link provided, but that's it; the CDBaby links do not strike me as reliable. I don't think notability has been sufficiently established. MuZemike 02:50, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * keep for now, see what reviews and where. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharkey45 (talk • contribs) 12:54, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Please explain how "see what reviews and where" fits WP:MUSIC, your meaning is unclear. TheJazzDalek (talk) 16:02, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable release.  C  anniba loki  16:46, 7 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.