Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Me to Church (Sinéad O'Connor song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect (non-admin closure) Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:06, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Take Me to Church (Sinéad O'Connor song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The artist may be notable, but this article fails WP:NSONG. This title should probably be redirected to I'm Not Bossy, I'm the Boss as an R from song. Steel1943 (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  02:07, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep In my view, the following three sources   are enough to meet WP:NSONG.  Everymorning   talk  02:08, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable song, Fails GNG as well as NSONG. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:23, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per the three sources devoted to the song as pointed out by Everymorning. Kokoro20 (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:22, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Sources consist of WP:Routine passing mentions of first single from her new album; WP:TOOSOON to tell if it'll be a hit with lasting social impact. Pax 08:25, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect per nom. Sources consist of WP:ROUTINE mentions of the song's existence, and nothing written or sourced in the article comes even close to satisfying WP:NSONGS. The mere fact that a song can be sourced as existing does not, in and of itself, constitute a reason why it warrants its own separate encyclopedia article rather than a simple mention in the article on the album from whence it came, and even as someone who liked this song quite a lot I'm not aware of any particular reason why it should be considered any more notable than the norm. Bearcat (talk) 03:18, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.