Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Take Me to Your Leader (Hawkwind album)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 17:35, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Take Me to Your Leader (Hawkwind album)
Prodded as No indication that WP:BAND is met (which is patently false) and then deprodded. Album's notability, however, is not yet established, as the content and style of the article make rather clear, since it has attracted no cleanup. Eusebeus 16:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. Very notable band and their first studio album in five years. Needs a cleanup but should be kept. Keresaspa 17:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep - per Keresaspa &mdash; ßottesiηi  Tell me what's up 19:03, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is a very notable band that's been around for the better part of forty years.  RGTraynor 19:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't like Hawkwind, but they totally meet and exceed WP:BAND and and album from them is notable.  Should be moved to Take Me to Your Leader (album) though for consistancy. --Isotope23 21:33, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep for sure but should be put into standard album entry format as per WikiProject Albums Ac@osr 22:12, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. --badlydrawnjeff (WP:MEMES?) 22:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - the article is now in proper format.Ac@osr 10:10, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 13:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment No evidence of bad faith nomination here. Please render opinions on the basis of the merits of the article, not the nomination.  Besides, calling the nomination into question here borders on WP:POINT since the opinions already rendered make it blatently obvious this will be kept.--Isotope23 15:04, 25 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.