Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeo Kikuchi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  07:37, 16 October 2021 (UTC)

Takeo Kikuchi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:GNG. No references. Promotional tone. Imcdc (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 03:40, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Imcdc (talk) 03:51, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mikehawk10 (talk) 06:52, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. The sources at ja:菊池武夫 (ファッションデザイナー) suggest the subject has been covered enough to satisfy notability guidelines, including in publications like in Fashion Headline, Fashion Snap , Yahoo! Japan , The Japan Times , and so on. Further biographical content can be extracted from interviews with President Style , GQ Japan , Fashion Snap , Sow.Tokyo , etc. He is regularly described as a considerable contributor to men's fashion. The underwhelming article seems like the result of systematic bias. ✗  plicit  06:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep I updated article and removed promotional word like famous. there is significant coverage in Japanese. so meets WP:GNG.Mahdiar86 (talk) 21:35, 8 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.