Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takeshi Utsumi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Takeshi Utsumi

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NBIO and WP:PROF, lacks WP:SIGCOV DirtyHarry991 (talk) 07:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators. DirtyHarry991 (talk) 07:50, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as fanboy spam. How on earth has this been around since 2006?!?!?! A search on Google scholar yields a number of papers by someone with a similar name, and a couple by this subject discussing his own work, but I don’t see anything third party about him at all. Mccapra (talk) 09:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable as a scholar or GNG as far as I can tell. The page is also very promotional. -- Mvqr (talk) 12:56, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete unless BIO can be improved to make notability apparent. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:34, 24 December 2023 (UTC).
 * Delete. Fulbright alone is not enough for automatic notability, the only plausible form of notability is GNG, the sources listed in the article are non-independent (and mostly deadlinks), and searching did not turn up anything better. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:25, 27 December 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.