Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tako Natsvlishvili


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) JAaron95  Talk   13:25, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Tako Natsvlishvili

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Low notability and no real importance with self-advertising and promotional purposes are seen, thus suggest we delete it. Jaqeli 21:06, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (country)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:49, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep or at least redirect to NEXT Model Management. I really don't think it's overpromotional, and if so this can be fixed. Young (but stunnning!) model so this would be a case of WP:TOOSOON. She's walked in major shows, and been featured in a lot of Georgian news, particularly talk shows. Unfortunately I can't understand Georgian but it's pretty clear on the shows they are talking about her career. I wouldn't suggest deleting, at least redirect.,, , ,   , , , , . No need to delete.   —Мандичка YO 😜 00:10, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Leaning keep based on the sources and the nice break-down of her career listed by Мандичка. It all seems to point towards sufficient coverage with enough variety of sources and publications for her to pass general notability. Mabalu (talk) 12:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, S warm   we ♥ our hive  07:47, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per sources found, They're not perfect I'll admit but the videos can be used as sources atleast until something better crops up, Personally I think it needs improving not deleting. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:55, 31 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.