Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tako Taal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 05:50, 4 November 2021 (UTC)

Tako Taal

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This artist is "scheduled to debut her first solo exhibition" but we already have an encyclopedia article about her. That's too soon. Can we give our subjects some time to actually create the body of work that they perhaps, some 25 years from now, are going to be known for? Vexations (talk) 14:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Vexations (talk) 14:09, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 15:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions.  Sennecaster  ( Chat ) 15:06, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wales-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:18, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON this emerging artist is at the very beginning stages of her career. No indication that her work is included in significant museum collections; nor received in-depth coverage in reviews/articles over an extended period of time in independent reliable sources. She is not yet considered a significant contributor to her field, nor created a well-known work or collective body of work, but perhaps over the next several years her career will develop enough to sustain an article. Does not pass WP:NARTIST criteria for inclusion. Netherzone (talk) 22:53, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete GNG fail. There is a bit of coverage, but the majority of it is published by the organizations she has worked with. Some other sources I saw were interviews. This article is about five or ten years ahead of its time, assuming her career continues on the same upward trajectory.  --- Possibly &#9742; 01:12, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment Thank you for your thoughtful feedback, everyone. I am the author of this article and I can see it may be too soon. Perhaps this could be moved to draft space for improvements over the coming months? LeahLockhart (talk) 15:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Unsure, does not come close to meeting the WP:NARTIST criteria, but that is not the whole story. A quick search has revealed useful coverage in reliable sources
 * – Interview-based feature
 * – Interview
 * – Mention in a review of a group exhibition
 * The first two are substantial articles in a major newspaper and a significant art magazine. The third is a brief mention in the New York Times, indicating an international profile. Her upcoming solo exhibition at Dundee Contemporary Arts may attract substantial reviews - perhaps we should keep this open for a few weeks until it has opened. Verbcatcher (talk) 18:15, 27 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.