Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Takuya Uehara


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 15:33, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

Takuya Uehara

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete - working young actor, and good luck to him, but nothing to point to notability Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - A Japanese actor who has has significant roles in several TV and film productions. Geofth (talk) 20:27, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Which listed do you see as significant?--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:21, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  D u s t i *poke* 01:17, 9 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Admins please consider this hit-and-run editor who shows up sporadically, opines then leaves for months without backing up claims. Nothing in the article presently shows notability.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 02:54, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete as the article does not establish notability beyond a list performances in projects that have their own notability issues. No sources are cited.   On a separate topic, to other editors, please refrain from commenting on your fellow editor's actions per WP:FOC —  f c s u p e r ( How's That?, That's How! ) (Exclusionistic Immediatist ) —  06:12, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.