Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talakusuma Govindpur High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  23:53, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Talakusuma Govindpur High School

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable school. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:SIGCOV and WP:ORG.  Peter Ormond &#128172;  22:16, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:18, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete The sourcing here in no way meets GNG or organizational notability guidelines. I went through various possible source searching options listed with the deletion nomination, and came up with nothing. I would suggest that the various school related nominations from today may need to be left open longer than normal. It takes quite some time to go through both the articles and a search for possible sources for even one of the schools. Some of these articles are quite long, and we want people participating in the discussion to have the ability to go over the article and consider other sources. I think this article illustrates the roots of the problem. When we had the secondary school notability guideline, it was written with the large urban and suburban US high school in mind. I went to Sterling Heights High School. That school employs just over 60 teachers. It has an enrollment of about 1500, which is not by any means exceptionally large among public high schools in the US. This school here has 9 teachers. Even among US high schools there are many schools that are extremely small and even the high school I went to rarely receives indepth coverage that says anything substantive about it. This whole thing is a mess. I think the best course is to evaluate schools on a case by case basis. I fear unless we are willing to wait at least a month many of the school nominations that started today will be closed without adequate discussion.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:58, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment I wish we would go to requiring that all articles go through the Aritcle for Creation process. It would lead to much better sourcing on the articles we get.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:59, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
 * - I completely agree with you, John. With hundreds of unsourced or badly sourced articles being created every day, it's becoming impossible to manage. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 15:25, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
 * We actually are better off than we were a decade ago. However it is shocking how many unsourced articles have lasted over a decade. We still suffer from Wikipedia starting out as a wild west, no order enrivornment.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:30, 15 December 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete The references in the article are extremely poor and there doesn't seem to be any out there that we can use for notability. So this clearly doesn't pass the notability guidelines. WP:NORG or otherwise. --Adamant1 (talk) 07:14, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment It has been more than 5 years I have created this article. Regarding notable part I am not sure. I will add few references if that works. This is a govt funded school in rural place. -- Jnanaranjan Sahu (ଜ୍ଞାନ) talk 05:03, 18 December 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.