Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talarius gaming system


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Spartaz Humbug! 22:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Talarius gaming system

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. I PRODded this page because the system is, so far as I can tell, utterly non-notable, with a google search only showing three reviews, two by one reviewer and all three of those on RPG.net (i.e. user submitted) and both reviewers being among the game's playtesters. Oh, and one review on Geek Native that very closely matches an RPG.net review. (Note: Do not confuse this tabletop RPG with the company that makes slot machines by the name Talarius). According to |the person contesting the PROD "I am the owner/creator of the Talarius Gaming System ... I actually use this page to tell more people about the gaming system." Also the article creator was a wp:SPA, and for that matter so is one of the other contributors.

For that matter finding anything at all on the system is difficult - the only game I've found that uses it is Legends of Kralis (so I've given all the notability I can find for that game; the system doesn't seem to be independently notable of the game - but the game has no page of its own to merge to right now). So I'm treating everything to do with Legends of Kralis (such that there is) as establishing notability for the system.

So far as I can tell this is pure wp:Promotion. Given the person who is contesting the Prod is "the owner/creator of the Talarius Gaming System" there's also a case under wp:A11 as I see no assertion of notability on the page. Neonchameleon (talk) 00:23, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:37, 9 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:PROMO. Fails WP:GNG; what coverage there is out there is non-independent if not directly self-published. -- El Hef  ( Meep? ) 03:19, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 17:23, 21 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.