Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales of Aravorn: Seasons of the Wolf


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. (non-admin closure) Toadette  ( Let's discuss together! ) 07:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Tales of Aravorn: Seasons of the Wolf

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

RPGamer and Digitally Downloaded gave it full reviews. The TechRaptor review is from early January 2015. They have stated that "we had near-nonexistent editorial policies" until January 2015 and removed large amounts of content from 2013-16 that was low-quality, but this review might have been missed in the sweep. RPGFan, a reliable source, has included it in several listicles that don't provide enough for notability. QuietCicada chirp 15:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. QuietCicada chirp 15:25, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Not all listicles are useless. In this case, they're clearly not intended as clickbait and have genuine useful insights into games. I think they are on par with the game getting a review from RPGFan. It isn't the strongest sourcing but it does squeak past notability. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:43, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  19:27, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak keep. In general, if I was bringing a new article on a video game into the mainspace, I'd look for 3 solid sources, and if we grant the nominator's argument, we basically have two (RPGamer & Digitally Downloaded).  TechRaptor pre-2020 is indeed a weak source, but the review seems unobjectionable enough.  Basically, we have two-and-a-half good sources, and I don't think it's worth being a super stickler here.  It's a borderline notability topic, sure, but in general probably best to err on the side of keeping here.  SnowFire (talk) 04:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.