Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tales of Dark


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:53, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Tales of Dark

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails WP:N and WP:V for bands. Pretty much non-existent reliable, third party sources. Rafablu88 04:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Tenative keep on this one, I think it just might be notable, given that it has a label. If nobody else can find some evidence of notability, I'd say delete. Irbisgreif (talk) 14:18, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * In the same way that being a famous band doesn't automatically warrant specific articles about all their releases, being a notable label doesn't mean all its bands require a page, too. The band itself, which is the entity in question, has zilch third-party notable and reliable references. Rafablu88  17:33, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hence the tenative. Irbisgreif (talk) 15:01, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
 * What's the point of even making a !vote if you haven't done any research into whether or not the band has been covered? Tim  meh  ( review me ) 01:15, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I did some checking, but I'm aware that someone else may have found something I missed or didn't see. Irbisgreif (talk) 01:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Wouldn't it be better to just research the subject fully and make a vote with confidence rather than an iffy tentative vote? Tim  meh  ( review me ) 01:33, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I can never 'fully' research something. Irbisgreif (talk) 05:10, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * True enough, I suppose. I'll leave you to make your "tentative" votes. :) Tim  meh  ( review me ) 23:09, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:14, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I can't find any coverage in reliable sources. A Google News search returns no results related to the band, and a regular Google search turns up nothing reliable. Tim  meh  ( review me ) 01:12, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.