Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talia Madison


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. GRBerry 16:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Talia Madison

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This model/wrestler is not notable, the article is poorly written there isn't sources confirming her career, and this article contains fragments and run-on sentences. Also there isn't enough information to make an article about her Art 281 20:23, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I couldn't find reliable third party sources, but she is heavily mentioned on Professional Wrestling websites. Perhaps someone from this Wikiproject might be of some assistance? ~ Eliz 81 (C)  01:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I think "heavily mentioned is very much an exageration, she may have been mentioned in a trivial manner like "this year's list of diva participants" or something like that but hardly warranting an article on her own. MPJ-DK 20:32, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I believe the expertise and experience of others within the appropriate community-- in this case, wrestling-- is useful for assessing notability. Hopefully some editors who are familiar with the topic will offer their recommendations here soon. ~ Eliz  81 (C) 00:29, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment With all due respect, MPJ is a member of the wrestling community and has contributed significantly to WP:PW in the past. --Naha|(talk) 14:37, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment That doesn't make her a notable person, look at the article! Is poorly written. (And yes I know somebody could add some more information but there aren't any sources. Art 281 03:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletions.   —Nikki311 19:26, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I am one of those so called people with "expertise and experience" in the wrestling community. She's not notable, being an early cut in the Diva search isn't enough for a wikipedia article, achieving minor things in wrestling isn't enough. And like I said "Heavily mentioned" is a direct exaggeration of how much she's been mentioned on wrestling websites - it's been trivial mentions if she's mentioned at all.MPJ-DK 05:35, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Great! Then thank you for clarifying what helps indicate and not indicate notability in the wrestling community. She had enough hits on wrestling-related websites (as opposed to lengthy articles, in terms of what I meant by 'heavily mentioned') that it gave me pause. Your input is very valuable for wrestling outsiders. ~ Eliz 81 (C)  07:51, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, per MPJ-DK...and I am also "one of those so called people with 'expertise and experience' in the wrestling community". Nikki311 17:07, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment If she at Bound for Glory (2007) and stays around at TNA after then she deserves a page, otherwise bye bye. Madbassist 10:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete err, I need to read everything before I make comments. As one of those who fits into the same category as MPJ and Nikki, delete per them. --Naha|(talk) 14:42, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment after close She also is known as Jamie Szantyr and this link is provided so that What links here for Jamie Szantyr brings up this AfD. -- Jreferee    t / c  23:03, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment after close Talia Madison (Jamie Szantyr) exists, and is arguably notable now (Madbassist's suggested condition has been met). Please either counterargue, or make "Talia Madison" and "Jamie Szantyr" redirect to it (or rename it to one of those, and make the other redirect to that). Emurphy42 16:43, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.