Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk.bizarre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 15:36, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Talk.bizarre

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)
 * I also nominate the redirect ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD)  (View log)

I decline to speedy this, since the article has sufficient content that one might consider the newsgroup in question to be notable. However, the newsgroup may remain non-notable. Richard Cavell (talk) 07:34, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete By WP:WEB standards, this is no more notable than your average web-based forum that has by and large replaced USENET. Google hits are nearly all for sites that archive USENET postings, just as some sites mirror Wikipedia. Google Groups is merely Google's own newsfeed. The hits in Google News' archive are either false positives, or cites as background for a wider article. Such a mention is not considered valid as a show of notability. DarkAudit (talk) 13:13, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Without proper sources this entire article is original research. Beeblbrox (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete Fails WP:WEB in every area. Undeath (talk) 06:10, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  20:54, 20 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.