Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Bon Jovi Album Discography (Extended)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Wizardman 01:59, 21 December 2009 (UTC)

Bon Jovi Album Discography (Extended)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  AfD statistics)

duplicates information already present in the Bon Jovi discography any other information in unsourced and from WP:BADCHARTS. This article should be deleted and any valuable sourced information be merged into the proper discography. Mister sparky (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete useless, info can be found in Bon Jovi discography --Caldorwards4 (talk) 23:23, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; mostly redundant information. Any reliably-sourced material not already in Bon Jovi discography can be merged there.  Gongshow  Talk 00:32, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 00:48, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  —  Gongshow  Talk 00:49, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Again, mostly redundant information. Langdon (talk) 01:31, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, redundant. - eo (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge with Bon Jovi discography - it seems that all the information included in the above article could be included in the normal discography, there is no need for an extended version. --SteelersFanUK06  ReplyOnMine!   03:29, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete/Merge - any important information not included in Bon Jovi discography should be added to that article, and this one should be deleted. I don't see any reason why we need two articles covering essentially the same thing.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  17:32, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.